Welcome to UK Thrash!

new thrash vs old thrash

Talk about thrash from the UK.

Moderators: James, Craig, Resilience Records

Re: new thrash vs old thrash

Postby thrashduck on Sat Sep 20, 2008 1:38 am

The Fourth Norseman wrote:after going back on thrashmageddon, the thrash bands below the likes of heathen and vio-lence levels of fame really are underground for a reason


There's a wide array of metahoool on there you dork, among a number of sub-par pedestrian thrash bands.
IN A BAND?! SEND ME NEWS NOW!
http://www.facebook.com/ukthrashpodcast

NEKROKANNIBAL wrote: delete this account now coz this forum is pure fuckin gay lame shit
thrashduck
User avatar
 
Posts: 6732
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 5:03 am
Location: Super Leeds

Re: new thrash vs old thrash

Postby H.O.D. Feemo on Sat Sep 20, 2008 12:52 pm

Great thread.

Give it two years, all this will be old thrash anyway, we'll all be in the bargin bin under Nu-Thrash.

P.S. Moshing and beer are probably two of the best song subjects ever!
H.O.D. Feemo
User avatar
 
Posts: 2135
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 12:38 pm
Location: In a grotty flat with Richie

Re: new thrash vs old thrash

Postby Immortalicide on Sat Sep 20, 2008 2:09 pm

Cum-Blaster 2000 wrote:
Shugmaster wrote:
Cum-Blaster 2000 wrote:But Hair Metal died at roughly the same time and it wasn't generic at all. If anything, the bands had only just got on to covering meaningful subjects - like death and Nam - when it went tits-up.


I was commenting on the music, not the lyrical content.

Hair Metal was killed by the fact that the bands all ended up with either habits that were killing them or out of control egos that killed the "band".


LIES!

They were killed by AIDS.


no, that was just robin crosby
Image
Immortalicide
User avatar
 
Posts: 3184
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 7:08 pm
Location: Bah! Pfft! Tut & Humph!!!

Re: new thrash vs old thrash

Postby Lev on Sat Sep 20, 2008 2:16 pm

Nah, he died of keyboards.
James wrote:This Facebook notification says it all really:

Martin James Crawford became a fan of Heretic (1 fan).
Lev
User avatar
 
Posts: 7108
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2007 11:17 am
Location: Thursby, Cumbria

Re: new thrash vs old thrash

Postby Immortalicide on Sat Sep 20, 2008 2:18 pm

Lev wrote:Nah, he died of keyboards.


you missed the moment, i didnt, that joke fails cumbrianbummerboi, i win immensley!!!!!
Image
Immortalicide
User avatar
 
Posts: 3184
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 7:08 pm
Location: Bah! Pfft! Tut & Humph!!!

Re: new thrash vs old thrash

Postby Lev on Sat Sep 20, 2008 2:30 pm

Pfft.
James wrote:This Facebook notification says it all really:

Martin James Crawford became a fan of Heretic (1 fan).
Lev
User avatar
 
Posts: 7108
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2007 11:17 am
Location: Thursby, Cumbria

Re: new thrash vs old thrash

Postby meluaz on Sat Sep 20, 2008 4:15 pm

grunge sucks because it shit!!!! because retarded people cant listen to more than 3 chords or their heads will explode, they are too inferior to listen to thrash!!
Image Image
MartinC wrote:HOW CAN PEARL JAM BE GOOD?! THEY ARE NOT METALLSSSS!!!1111

/Zurab
meluaz
User avatar
 
Posts: 2680
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2008 12:09 pm
Location: london

Re: new thrash vs old thrash

Postby terrorizer on Sat Sep 20, 2008 4:17 pm

zurabmelua wrote:grunge sucks because it shit!!!!


What a well thought out argument. Ever considered politics?
Image

"If you want a picture of the future of UK Thrash, imagine a boot stamping on a Member's face, forever."
terrorizer
User avatar
 
Posts: 3429
Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 2:44 pm
Location: Burton upon Trent

Re: new thrash vs old thrash

Postby madcossack on Sat Sep 20, 2008 4:20 pm

oh finally zurab comes along all gunz blazing! thank you oh so much, but this is a loosing battle for us, i think we should just nuke the fucking site
madcossack
User avatar
 
Posts: 88
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2008 2:02 pm
Location: Horsham

Re: new thrash vs old thrash

Postby Throsh on Sat Sep 20, 2008 4:24 pm

Thrash rules!!!!!!
Throsh
User avatar
 
Posts: 619
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2008 6:02 pm
Location: Walsall, West Midlands

Re: new thrash vs old thrash

Postby meluaz on Sat Sep 20, 2008 4:25 pm

dont worry i will get my georgian friends to hack it
Image Image
MartinC wrote:HOW CAN PEARL JAM BE GOOD?! THEY ARE NOT METALLSSSS!!!1111

/Zurab
meluaz
User avatar
 
Posts: 2680
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2008 12:09 pm
Location: london

Re: new thrash vs old thrash

Postby Throsh on Sat Sep 20, 2008 4:26 pm

I was actually thinking about that last night, A big Ukgant logo along with pictures of bullet belts and the larc.
Throsh
User avatar
 
Posts: 619
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2008 6:02 pm
Location: Walsall, West Midlands

Re: new thrash vs old thrash

Postby thrashduck on Sat Sep 20, 2008 4:27 pm

zurabmelua wrote:dont worry i will get my georgian friends to hack it


You don't have computers in Georgia...
IN A BAND?! SEND ME NEWS NOW!
http://www.facebook.com/ukthrashpodcast

NEKROKANNIBAL wrote: delete this account now coz this forum is pure fuckin gay lame shit
thrashduck
User avatar
 
Posts: 6732
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 5:03 am
Location: Super Leeds

Re: new thrash vs old thrash

Postby madcossack on Sat Sep 20, 2008 4:32 pm

thats not true , oxfam have recently donated some windows 95 computers, since the rest were used as missiles in georgian catapults
madcossack
User avatar
 
Posts: 88
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2008 2:02 pm
Location: Horsham

Re: new thrash vs old thrash

Postby Lev on Sat Sep 20, 2008 4:34 pm

zurabmelua wrote:grunge sucks because it shit!!!! because retarded people cant listen to more than 3 chords or their heads will explode, they are too inferior to listen to thrash!!


Dear me. I don't like grunge, but I'm going to stick up for it here. If anything is more three-chordy, it's thrash.
James wrote:This Facebook notification says it all really:

Martin James Crawford became a fan of Heretic (1 fan).
Lev
User avatar
 
Posts: 7108
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2007 11:17 am
Location: Thursby, Cumbria