new thrash vs old thrash
Moderators: James, Craig, Resilience Records
Re: new thrash vs old thrash
Was that the lip gloss strain of AIDS that didn't get much coverage on the news?
- Shugmaster
- Posts: 903
- Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 7:46 pm
- Location: Edinburgh
Re: new thrash vs old thrash
Shugmaster wrote:Thrash was done to death in the 80's. Every angle was covered back then so this forlorn hope to hear something that isn't "generic" is almost laughable. If you aren't generic then you aren't Thrash. Thrash died for a reason in the early 90's. It got boring and repetitive and it will happen again (but a bit more quickly).
theres a difference between not being original and not being generic.
Metal Iain wrote:This board has nothing to do with the 'scene'. It's more just about 10 or so pricks who used to like Thrash that, for one reason or another, waste a lot of time posting on here.
- boovidge
- Posts: 3296
- Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 11:03 am
- Location: Brighton
Re: new thrash vs old thrash
boovidge wrote:all music fads end. whats happened to emo? i havent heard anything about that in ages
Check out Gama Bomb.
- Metal Iain
- Posts: 7332
- Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 4:54 pm
- Location: Dunfermline, Scotland
Re: new thrash vs old thrash
boovidge wrote:Shugmaster wrote:Thrash was done to death in the 80's. Every angle was covered back then so this forlorn hope to hear something that isn't "generic" is almost laughable. If you aren't generic then you aren't Thrash. Thrash died for a reason in the early 90's. It got boring and repetitive and it will happen again (but a bit more quickly).
theres a difference between not being original and not being generic.
No there's not!
- Metal Iain
- Posts: 7332
- Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 4:54 pm
- Location: Dunfermline, Scotland
Re: new thrash vs old thrash
emo is like a cockroach, it scuttles away to survive a nuclear winter, and then come back mutated and disfiguared, ready to crush us.
- madcossack
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2008 2:02 pm
- Location: Horsham
Re: new thrash vs old thrash
Emo people all love Thrash now. It's pretty funny.
- Metal Iain
- Posts: 7332
- Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 4:54 pm
- Location: Dunfermline, Scotland
Re: new thrash vs old thrash
Cum-Blaster 2000 wrote:boovidge wrote:all music fads end. whats happened to emo? i havent heard anything about that in ages
Check out Gama Bomb.
how the fuck is gamabomb emo? fuck u man, have u even listened to them? u listen to glam rock ,get off this site!
- madcossack
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2008 2:02 pm
- Location: Horsham
Re: new thrash vs old thrash
trust me emos DONT like thrash!
- madcossack
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2008 2:02 pm
- Location: Horsham
Re: new thrash vs old thrash
madcossack wrote:Cum-Blaster 2000 wrote:boovidge wrote:all music fads end. whats happened to emo? i havent heard anything about that in ages
Check out Gama Bomb.
how the fuck is gamabomb emo? fuck u man, have u even listened to them? u listen to glam rock ,get off this site!
I bought Gama Bomb's first album as soon as it came out. Sadly, they're now into smashing up CDs and using incorrect grammar. Emos.
Emo people love Thrash now. All the people I knew from school who turned Emo are now into Thrash like you wouldn't believe. There's really not that much difference between Thrash and Emo: tight jeans, crap haircuts and silly belts.
Last edited by Metal Iain on Fri Sep 19, 2008 10:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Metal Iain
- Posts: 7332
- Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 4:54 pm
- Location: Dunfermline, Scotland
Re: new thrash vs old thrash
thrash til deff!!!!!!!!!!!!!1111
fuck emo yea!
fuck emo yea!
Metal Iain wrote:This board has nothing to do with the 'scene'. It's more just about 10 or so pricks who used to like Thrash that, for one reason or another, waste a lot of time posting on here.
- boovidge
- Posts: 3296
- Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 11:03 am
- Location: Brighton
Re: new thrash vs old thrash
You'll come to discover that this site is nothing to do with thrash.
- Throsh
- Posts: 619
- Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2008 6:02 pm
- Location: Walsall, West Midlands
Re: new thrash vs old thrash
boovidge wrote:the new bands havent had the time to mature yet so they're still bringing out generic albums and singing about moshing and beer. In a few years some might get good.
er i thought that was the point?
- madcossack
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2008 2:02 pm
- Location: Horsham
Re: new thrash vs old thrash
madcossack wrote:boovidge wrote:the new bands havent had the time to mature yet so they're still bringing out generic albums and singing about moshing and beer. In a few years some might get good.
er i thought that was the point?
Nah, because in a few years, half the people on here will have matured, got haircuts and started listening to Oasis.
- Metal Iain
- Posts: 7332
- Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 4:54 pm
- Location: Dunfermline, Scotland
Re: new thrash vs old thrash
If they get good they won't be playing thrash anymore.
- Shugmaster
- Posts: 903
- Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 7:46 pm
- Location: Edinburgh
Re: new thrash vs old thrash
madcossack wrote:boovidge wrote:the new bands havent had the time to mature yet so they're still bringing out generic albums and singing about moshing and beer. In a few years some might get good.
er i thought that was the point?
Well maybe it is and that's why in two years nobody will like thrash anymore.
Metal Iain wrote:This board has nothing to do with the 'scene'. It's more just about 10 or so pricks who used to like Thrash that, for one reason or another, waste a lot of time posting on here.
- boovidge
- Posts: 3296
- Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 11:03 am
- Location: Brighton