Welcome to UK Thrash!

What is your take on remastered albums?

General music discussion

Moderators: James, Craig, Resilience Records

Re: What is your take on remastered albums?

Postby Lev on Fri Mar 14, 2008 4:10 pm

I think I'm the only person who can never tell the difference.
James wrote:This Facebook notification says it all really:

Martin James Crawford became a fan of Heretic (1 fan).
Lev
User avatar
 
Posts: 7108
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2007 11:17 am
Location: Thursby, Cumbria

Re: What is your take on remastered albums?

Postby thrash metal maniac on Fri Mar 14, 2008 4:26 pm

okay okay, heres the best way - go and get Reign In Blood remaster, listen to it, then get the original and listen to that, then tell me you cant tell the difference?!? :P
thrash metal maniac
User avatar
 
Posts: 5499
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 5:20 pm
Location: Bristol

Re: What is your take on remastered albums?

Postby Lev on Fri Mar 14, 2008 4:31 pm

Well I'll be able to tell the difference if I play them seconds after each other. But if someone came in and went "New Remastered Megadeth album, listen to the difference". I'd just be like "it's..their song...what?"
James wrote:This Facebook notification says it all really:

Martin James Crawford became a fan of Heretic (1 fan).
Lev
User avatar
 
Posts: 7108
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2007 11:17 am
Location: Thursby, Cumbria

Re: What is your take on remastered albums?

Postby thrash metal maniac on Fri Mar 14, 2008 4:47 pm

lol yeah I know what yu mean, the only difference I noticed with the Megadeth remasters is that I could actually hear the songs on my portable cd player on the bus :P
thrash metal maniac
User avatar
 
Posts: 5499
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 5:20 pm
Location: Bristol

Re: What is your take on remastered albums?

Postby thrasherdave on Sun Mar 16, 2008 4:11 pm

I'd relaly like Testament to remaster their back catalogue up to Low - I was listening to Souls of Black the other day and I could barely hear it, so i put on The Legacy and the mastering was much better on it. So how come their first album has better quality than their fourth?!

Testament fucked up.
Dian Wei wrote:It's that UKT vibe, we all basically are gay for one another.
thrasherdave
User avatar
 
Posts: 2402
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2008 6:45 pm
Location: Sheffield, UK

Re: What is your take on remastered albums?

Postby Atom on Sun Mar 16, 2008 4:19 pm

I would really like to hear ...AJFA with a great re-master job so you can hear the bass. That would be cool.
Image
Atom
User avatar
 
Posts: 3698
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 10:17 pm
Location: London

Re: What is your take on remastered albums?

Postby terrorizer on Sun Mar 16, 2008 5:41 pm

Atom wrote:I would really like to hear ...AJFA with a great re-master job so you can hear the bass. That would be cool.


No chance Atom!
Image

"If you want a picture of the future of UK Thrash, imagine a boot stamping on a Member's face, forever."
terrorizer
User avatar
 
Posts: 3429
Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 2:44 pm
Location: Burton upon Trent

Re: What is your take on remastered albums?

Postby thrash metal maniac on Mon Mar 17, 2008 2:27 pm

thrasherdave wrote:I'd relaly like Testament to remaster their back catalogue up to Low - I was listening to Souls of Black the other day and I could barely hear it, so i put on The Legacy and the mastering was much better on it. So how come their first album has better quality than their fourth?!


Think about it?

Maybe the CD version of the Legacy was given a bit of a digital remaster before being released?! And they wouldn't have changed the mastering on Souls.. since it was already digitally mastered when it was released orignally
thrash metal maniac
User avatar
 
Posts: 5499
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 5:20 pm
Location: Bristol

Re: What is your take on remastered albums?

Postby thrasherdave on Wed Mar 19, 2008 9:55 pm

Its possible :?
Dian Wei wrote:It's that UKT vibe, we all basically are gay for one another.
thrasherdave
User avatar
 
Posts: 2402
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2008 6:45 pm
Location: Sheffield, UK

Re: What is your take on remastered albums?

Postby Poisongage on Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:37 pm

I think that most thrash metal cannot be remastered without it being destroyed in the process. But then remastering can be many things. As long as it isn't remastered like Mustaine remastered Megadeth's albums, i think it is okay to remove spikes in audio levels and such, but not to alter the sound or add/remove elements from the original version.
Poisongage
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:27 pm

Re: What is your take on remastered albums?

Postby Holy Crap! Lions! on Fri Mar 28, 2008 1:56 am

Remasters are usually either really good or really bad.

All in all, I prefer getting an original LP of an album, because it always sounds better regardless of production.

Reign in Blood on LP owns my ears.
Holy Crap! Lions!
User avatar
 
Posts: 1141
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 8:27 pm
Location: Plymouth

Re: What is your take on remastered albums?

Postby thrash metal maniac on Sun Mar 30, 2008 2:37 pm

the cd pwns my ears pretty hard
thrash metal maniac
User avatar
 
Posts: 5499
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 5:20 pm
Location: Bristol