Welcome to UK Thrash!

 

Matt tuck Signiture Jacksons.....urgh

Chat about playing musical instruments

Moderators: James, Craig, Resilience Records

Matt tuck Signiture Jacksons.....urgh

Postby origamikid on Wed Jan 21, 2009 2:10 pm

I dont understand....Jackson why....

Matt tuck from Bullet for my Valentine has been given a signiture model of RR guitar....But Bullet not only suck hard...they arnt that popular... I meen Trivium suck hard but they have a huge fanbase and have been touring non-stop with big bands, so dean gave em signiture stuff...fair enuff i gues...not that they deserve it...but fair enuff.
Bullet released another shit album that was somehow worse then the first and they do little touring....and he gets this:

Image

Image

I dont like the finish on the guitar and i dont like the inlays :S

http://www.jacksonguitars.com/products/ ... 2900506577

For more pics
Fistful Of Metal Magazine- Coming soon .... (http://www.origamikid.wordpress.com)
UK Editor for: http://www.metal-temple.com
Blog This Shit UP: http://origamikid.wordpress.com

James wrote:I don't hate them, I just think they're a disgrace to metal.

H.O.D. Feemo wrote:I play girls aloud a lot with my walkman on while walking the dog, some chavs caught me dancing once.
Gay enough?
origamikid
 
Posts: 1220
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 8:50 pm
Location: Southampton
Top

Re: Matt tuck Signiture Jacksons.....urgh

Postby thrash metal maniac on Wed Jan 21, 2009 2:55 pm

that's shit

i love those guitars, I even have one! But never in that finish. it looks stupid.

hardly a special signature model either, just a regular rrv in silver :lol:
thrash metal maniac
User avatar
 
Posts: 5499
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 5:20 pm
Location: Bristol
Top

Re: Matt tuck Signiture Jacksons.....urgh

Postby James on Wed Jan 21, 2009 3:27 pm

Yes, so in other words it required no extra effort to design or manufacture, and will no doubt harvest some sales from BFMV fans - an obvious business move.
thrashduck wrote:And the internet was without uk thrash form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of James moved upon the face of the waters.

"No Hellscourger, I would not like a strawberry."
James
Administrator
User avatar
 
Posts: 8334
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 6:17 pm
Location: Witham, Essex
Top

Re: Matt tuck Signiture Jacksons.....urgh

Postby thrash metal maniac on Wed Jan 21, 2009 3:43 pm

yeah i gathered that by looking at it, horrible jackson
thrash metal maniac
User avatar
 
Posts: 5499
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 5:20 pm
Location: Bristol
Top

Re: Matt tuck Signiture Jacksons.....urgh

Postby origamikid on Wed Jan 21, 2009 5:11 pm

thrash metal maniac wrote:yeah i gathered that by looking at it, horrible jackson


I blame fender.... why did they have to buy out Jackson?
Fistful Of Metal Magazine- Coming soon .... (http://www.origamikid.wordpress.com)
UK Editor for: http://www.metal-temple.com
Blog This Shit UP: http://origamikid.wordpress.com

James wrote:I don't hate them, I just think they're a disgrace to metal.

H.O.D. Feemo wrote:I play girls aloud a lot with my walkman on while walking the dog, some chavs caught me dancing once.
Gay enough?
origamikid
 
Posts: 1220
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 8:50 pm
Location: Southampton
Top

Re: Matt tuck Signiture Jacksons.....urgh

Postby meluaz on Wed Jan 21, 2009 7:12 pm

why do jacksons appeal to thrash metaller so much? is it the fact that loads of thrashers in the 80's used em(not putting em down or anything)
Image Image
MartinC wrote:HOW CAN PEARL JAM BE GOOD?! THEY ARE NOT METALLSSSS!!!1111

/Zurab
meluaz
User avatar
 
Posts: 2680
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2008 12:09 pm
Location: london
Top

Re: Matt tuck Signiture Jacksons.....urgh

Postby thrash metal maniac on Wed Jan 21, 2009 8:49 pm

yeah, basically, and the poiny headstocks
thrash metal maniac
User avatar
 
Posts: 5499
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 5:20 pm
Location: Bristol
Top

Re: Matt tuck Signiture Jacksons.....urgh

Postby meluaz on Wed Jan 21, 2009 10:32 pm

i really would like to have a kelly
Image Image
MartinC wrote:HOW CAN PEARL JAM BE GOOD?! THEY ARE NOT METALLSSSS!!!1111

/Zurab
meluaz
User avatar
 
Posts: 2680
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2008 12:09 pm
Location: london
Top

Re: Matt tuck Signiture Jacksons.....urgh

Postby united_we_stand on Wed Jan 21, 2009 11:42 pm

most people go for the fact that the look very metal!! but i have two jackson guitars and they're both awesome guitars!!
united_we_stand
 
Posts: 179
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 5:08 pm
Location: Londond
Top

Re: Matt tuck Signiture Jacksons.....urgh

Postby Metal Iain on Thu Jan 22, 2009 1:12 am

Two things:

- Matt who?

- Why the fuck has he basically got Jackson to ruin one of their most iconic designs by making a Jackson RR look a cross between a Dean and an ESP?!
Image
Metal Iain
User avatar
 
Posts: 7332
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 4:54 pm
Location: Dunfermline, Scotland
Top

Re: Matt tuck Signiture Jacksons.....urgh

Postby GoreBastard on Thu Jan 22, 2009 4:05 am

The only way that guitar could look any gayer would be if it had pink glitter all over it, which wouldn't suprise me because that band are fucking gays who put pink glitter on stuff.
GoreBastard
User avatar
 
Posts: 1718
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:26 am
Location: Quiverpool
Top

Re: Matt tuck Signiture Jacksons.....urgh

Postby H.O.D. Feemo on Thu Jan 22, 2009 12:14 pm

Oh for fucks sake.

Urge to kill..... Rising.... RISING.... RISING.....
H.O.D. Feemo
User avatar
 
Posts: 2135
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 12:38 pm
Location: In a grotty flat with Richie
Top

Re: Matt tuck Signiture Jacksons.....urgh

Postby united_we_stand on Thu Jan 22, 2009 12:55 pm

lol theres nothing wrong with the guitar itself, they've just got a normal RR body and given it an inverted headstock which is pretty cool, ok so the inlays are crap but for me its the fact that this gayboy has got his own signature jackson!
united_we_stand
 
Posts: 179
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 5:08 pm
Location: Londond
Top

Re: Matt tuck Signiture Jacksons.....urgh

Postby origamikid on Thu Jan 22, 2009 6:08 pm

united_we_stand wrote:lol theres nothing wrong with the guitar itself, they've just got a normal RR body and given it an inverted headstock which is pretty cool, ok so the inlays are crap but for me its the fact that this gayboy has got his own signature jackson!


I have always liked the headstock reverse on any guitar, it looks badass....however the finish is gay. It really is. Inlays are shit and he doesnt deserve it.

booo jackson...
Fistful Of Metal Magazine- Coming soon .... (http://www.origamikid.wordpress.com)
UK Editor for: http://www.metal-temple.com
Blog This Shit UP: http://origamikid.wordpress.com

James wrote:I don't hate them, I just think they're a disgrace to metal.

H.O.D. Feemo wrote:I play girls aloud a lot with my walkman on while walking the dog, some chavs caught me dancing once.
Gay enough?
origamikid
 
Posts: 1220
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 8:50 pm
Location: Southampton
Top

Re: Matt tuck Signiture Jacksons.....urgh

Postby EvileOL on Thu Jan 22, 2009 6:16 pm

suits the band i guess
EvileOL
 
Posts: 677
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2006 12:37 am
Location: West Yorkshire, UK
Top