STD_Caps wrote:Iain, you are opinionated no one can deny you that. Pity a lot of what you say is considered crap by the majority of people on this board.
To be fair, the majority of people on this board like Dark Angel...
God, remember their cover of Immigrant Song?
DON'T TRY IT RON!
STD_Caps wrote:A lot of the bands you list are pretty good in fairness but they don't surpass the bands you're dismissing when you come from a METAL perspective over a ROCK (whether, it's light, hard, stadium or any other kind) perspective. All the bands you have named do not have as many 'must-have' albums (1-4) from someone from a rock perspective (if they're being honest and not crazy-obsessives) compared to Black Sabbath and Led Zeppelin (5 as a minimum each). Considering your taste is coming from such a different area, maybe you should refrain from the 'Black Sabbath is turgid crap' or whatever...
That is complete bollocks.
Neither Black Sabbath nor Led Zeppelin have three must-have albums, let alone five! Kiss, on the other hand, do: Kiss, Hotter Than Hell, Dressed To Kill, Destroyer and Love Gun. And that's only if you count the stuff from the '70s...
Mind you, me saying Kiss have well over five must-have albums might sound as wrong to you as you saying to me that Black Sabbath have any must-have album (apart from Dehumanizer but I think we might have been through this before).
My taste isn't really coming from a different area seeing as when it comes to Metal I've been there, done that, bought a bunch of T-shirts, realised 'Holy SHIT! What am I doing?!', cut my hair, binned the T-shirts and gone back to having a more balanced music taste.
I don't really see why I need to come from any perspective either. In my opinion, a good band is a good band regardless of genre. I happen to think Deep Purple and Led Zeppelin are
criminally overrated and Black Sabbath just plain dire in the same way as I rate The Smiths but not The Cure or rate Megadeth but not Morbid Saint.