UK Thrash zine?

by **Bangover** on Tue Sep 25, 2007 7:25 pm

terrorizer wrote:
Holy Crap! Lions! wrote:I'm guessing we're not doing the Sekhmet review then?

So yes we are, but not without a copy of the album... hint hint.

For all involved. Apart from Aaron.

by **The Fourth Norseman** on Tue Sep 25, 2007 7:34 pm

Bangover wrote:
terrorizer wrote:
Holy Crap! Lions! wrote:I'm guessing we're not doing the Sekhmet review then?

So yes we are, but not without a copy of the album... hint hint.

For all involved. Apart from Aaron.

bens really lanky, and has shit shoes

by **Bangover** on Tue Sep 25, 2007 7:45 pm

The Fourth Norseman wrote:
Bangover wrote:
terrorizer wrote:
Holy Crap! Lions! wrote:I'm guessing we're not doing the Sekhmet review then?

So yes we are, but not without a copy of the album... hint hint.

For all involved. Apart from Aaron.

bens really lanky, and has shit shoes

Still remains that you couldn't score a goal against me even though I had a big fat joint my mouth, my spirit wasn't in it and I'm shit at football. There you go football boy.

Played with it more

by **The Fourth Norseman** on Tue Sep 25, 2007 7:51 pm

looks sexual.

by the way, i think we all know who the shit one is at football (cernunnos) :lol:

by **Bangover** on Tue Sep 25, 2007 7:54 pm

The Fourth Norseman wrote:looks sexual.

by the way, i think we all know who the shit one is at football (cernunnos)

bit simple

by **The Fourth Norseman** on Tue Sep 25, 2007 7:58 pm

by **STD_Caps** on Tue Sep 25, 2007 8:36 pm

The difference seems fairly negligible. NOTE: Pitiful Reign, not Pitiful.Reign.

by **Bangover** on Tue Sep 25, 2007 10:11 pm

Three designs to choose from:

Without Sodom man

Reversed

With Sodom man

Whatever one is prefered I will neaten up/sort any mistakes/take any suggestions and it will hopefully be teh final image of evil

by **terrorizer** on Tue Sep 25, 2007 10:17 pm

Must be "Without Sodom Man".

by **Bangover** on Tue Sep 25, 2007 10:19 pm

without Sodom man 1 point!

But seriously, if I don't get the outcome I want out of this you're all getting overruled.

by **James** on Wed Sep 26, 2007 11:26 am

I don't see the problem with the Sodom man! I like the idea of him becoming some sort of mascot, given the title of the zine.

I'd probably go with the third version - I don't have much preference between the second and third, but maybe having GAMA BOMB at the top is a bit better?

by **jonny_boy34** on Wed Sep 26, 2007 11:31 am

I'd choose either the 1st or 3rd one. I like the idea of Sodom Man, although it does a bit randomly placed on the cover. Next to the Rager logo, it looks like it's going something to do with them - it doesn't really stand out as a mascot for the zine. Maybe it would if it was positioned closer to the logo, I don't know how you'd do that though. So I suppose as it stands at the moment I'd go for number 1, but possibly number 3 if Sodom Boy was better placed. And also yes, Gamaboys at the top is better.

by **Atom** on Wed Sep 26, 2007 11:39 am

I think it would be cool to have the Sabbat style druid guy from the front cover of Dreamweaver on the front cover because after all, it is a UK Thrash thing, not German. Or maybe even the guy who is on the front of HOATTC? Know what I mean?

by **Raging Paul** on Wed Sep 26, 2007 12:09 pm

Either one which has Gama Bomb at the top i reckon. Unless you wana get a cool picture for the cover...

by **thrash metal maniac** on Wed Sep 26, 2007 12:19 pm

i'd say the toppest one for the win, looks well smart

also i agree with the general thoughts on sodom man!